Re: New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?

Hi Vijay, 

>One question for Christer:
>
>- Does 199 carry a message/sipfrag MIME type that conveys the
>  nature of the final non-2xx response?  This may have been
>  discussed in the past, and if so, please let me know.  I
>  do note that rfc3420 is specified in the draft as a normative
>  reference, but it is not referred to anywhere in the body
>  of the draft.

We discussed it quite much, and the outcome was a compromise: we don't
say anything :)

So, if someone wants to carry message/sipfrag in the 199 it is allowed,
but the base 199 draft does not require it.

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip