Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Dale Worley <[email protected]> wrote:

> But it avoids having
> to change the master URI syntax of RFC 3986, which is a task of much
> broader scope.

Both are going to require change (although we don't need world AND dog
to agree with a 3261 update), but seems to me that updating 3986 seems
like a far more appropriate path to take given the number of other
affected URI schemes as Hadriel pointed out.

I have no objection to the removal of '/' and '?' from the user part,
but the replacing of '[' and ']' seems quiet urgh.

... i've just quickly scanned through apps-discuss and haven't seen
any discussion on it there, should we perhaps test the water to see
what sort of reaction there would be to suggesting such an update if
it's the right thing to do?

 ~ Theo
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip