Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 4, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Theo Zourzouvillys wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Dale Worley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> But it avoids having >> to change the master URI syntax of RFC 3986, which is a task of much >> broader scope. > > Both are going to require change (although we don't need world AND dog > to agree with a 3261 update), but seems to me that updating 3986 seems > like a far more appropriate path to take given the number of other > affected URI schemes as Hadriel pointed out. > > I have no objection to the removal of '/' and '?' from the user part, > but the replacing of '[' and ']' seems quiet urgh. > > ... i've just quickly scanned through apps-discuss and haven't seen > any discussion on it there, should we perhaps test the water to see > what sort of reaction there would be to suggesting such an update if > it's the right thing to do? I'm afraid I have to concur with Theo. 3986 is just broken. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip