Re: Question regarding draft-dotson-sip-mutual-auth-03

"Sumanth Channabasappa" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Nils,

In the case you describe, the UAC cannot trust the response. So it can
take actions similar to when it does not receive a valid response: e.g.,
it can reasonably retry, log the error, and/or any other appropriate
behavior specified by the architecture. 

RFC3261 supports the Authentication-Info header (used in registration)
and not the Proxy-Authentication-Info header; which is why this I-D was
authored in the first place. The reference was to ensure that the
behavior is kept consistent, and available irrespective of registration
and non-registration messages. 

In any case, please refer to the following small thread (3 emails) for
the feedback I received during offline discussions at the last IETF:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg25882.html

	
- S

-----Original Message-----
From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 12:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Stuart Hoggan; Sumanth Channabasappa
Subject: Question regarding draft-dotson-sip-mutual-auth-03

Hello,

after reading the mutual auth draft:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dotson-sip-mutual-auth-03.txt

I have an open question:
what should the client do if the server send authentication informations
in a Proxy-Authentication-Info header back in a let say 200 response,
but
when the client computes response it comes to a different result (e.g.
because man in the middle changed something in the messages)?

In chapter 5 of your draft you are simply referring to RFC3261 for more
details regarding the implementation of the UAC. But I failed to find
any
information about the UAC handling of this header in 3261. Even RFC2617
gives no hints, at least I did not found any, what a client should do
when
the server authentication fails.
So it is probably not your fault, but still an interesting question I
think. Especially because the client has already send its credentials
when
the check of the server authentication fails.

Best regards
  Nils Ohlmeier

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.