Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-asserter-identity-01.txt

Hey John,
Thanks for reviewing the draft!  I was thinking that basically the asserter should decide what it wants to sign, but I think you're right that a default list would be good. 

-hadriel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elwell, John [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:29 AM
> 
> An interesting draft, perhaps useful in two ways: first in the way you
> intend (as asserter ID in closed domains or federations of closed
> domains), but secondly some aspects might be relevant for inclusion in
> an eventual solution to the SIP-Identity problem, notably the means of
> selecting particular body parts and SDP attributes to sign.
> 
> On that particular issue, I am not sure whether the asserter is in a
> position to decide on a request-by-request basis which body parts and
> SDP attributes to sign, since it cannot know what downstream entities
> are likely to need to do to those fields, so we may need some guidance
> (e.g., a default list of things to sign).

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip