Re: draft-ietf-sip-199-06
Tom Taylor <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Some text , as requested.
Christer Holmberg wrote:
...
>
>> In section 6:
>>
>> When a forking proxy receives a non-2xx final response that it
>> recognizes as terminating one or more early dialogs, if the proxy
>> does not intend to forward the final response immediately (in
>> accordance with rules for a forking proxy) and the UAC has indicated
>> support for the 199 response code, the proxy SHOULD generate and
> send
>> a 199 response upstream for each early dialog terminated on the
>> downstream side by the non-2xx final response, except for any early
>> dialog for which the proxy has previously received and forwarded a
>> 199 response.
>>
...
My suggestion:
"When a forking proxy receives a non-2xx final response that it
recognizes as terminating one or more early dialogs, it SHOULD generate
and send a 199 response upstream for each such early dialog satisfying the
following conditions:
-- the proxy does not intend to forward the final response immediately
(in accordance with rules for a forking proxy);
-- the UAC has indicated support for the 199 response code;
-- the proxy has not already received and forwarded a 199 response for
that early dialogue."
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip