Re: draft-ietf-sip-199-06

Tom Taylor <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Some text , as requested.

Christer Holmberg wrote:
...
> 
>> In section 6:
>>
>>   When a forking proxy receives a non-2xx final response that it
>>   recognizes as terminating one or more early dialogs, if the proxy
>>   does not intend to forward the final response immediately (in
>>   accordance with rules for a forking proxy) and the UAC has indicated
>>   support for the 199 response code, the proxy SHOULD generate and
> send
>>   a 199 response upstream for each early dialog terminated on the
>>   downstream side by the non-2xx final response, except for any early
>>   dialog for which the proxy has previously received and forwarded a
>>   199 response.
>>
...

My suggestion:

"When a forking proxy receives a non-2xx final response that it
  recognizes as terminating one or more early dialogs, it SHOULD generate
  and send a 199 response upstream for each such early dialog satisfying the
  following conditions:
  -- the proxy does not intend to forward the final response immediately
     (in accordance with rules for a forking proxy);
  -- the UAC has indicated support for the 199 response code;
  -- the proxy has not already received and forwarded a 199 response for
     that early dialogue."
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.