Re: draft-ietf-sip-199-06

"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0B168062@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
Hi,

Thanks for the text, Tom!

Regarding documenting that all 3 conditions must be fullfilled, and way
is to write ";and" after each condition.

 "When a forking proxy receives a non-2xx final response that it
  recognizes as terminating one or more early dialogs, it SHOULD
generate
  and send a 199 response upstream for each such early dialog satisfying
the
  following conditions:
  -- the proxy does not intend to forward the final response immediately
     (in accordance with rules for a forking proxy);and
  -- the UAC has indicated support for the 199 response code;and
  -- the proxy has not already received and forwarded a 199 response for
     that early dialogue."

Reegards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: Elwell, John [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 4:12 PM
To: Tom Taylor; Christer Holmberg
Cc: SIP WG; Adam Roach
Subject: RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-199-06

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Tom Taylor
> Sent: 23 March 2009 12:35
> To: Christer Holmberg
> Cc: SIP WG; Adam Roach
> Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-199-06
> 
> Some text , as requested.
> 
> Christer Holmberg wrote:
> ...
> > 
> >> In section 6:
> >>
> >>   When a forking proxy receives a non-2xx final response that it
> >>   recognizes as terminating one or more early dialogs, if the proxy
> >>   does not intend to forward the final response immediately (in
> >>   accordance with rules for a forking proxy) and the UAC
> has indicated
> >>   support for the 199 response code, the proxy SHOULD generate and
> > send
> >>   a 199 response upstream for each early dialog terminated on the
> >>   downstream side by the non-2xx final response, except
> for any early
> >>   dialog for which the proxy has previously received and
> forwarded a
> >>   199 response.
> >>
> ...
> 
> My suggestion:
> 
> "When a forking proxy receives a non-2xx final response that it
>   recognizes as terminating one or more early dialogs, it SHOULD 
> generate
>   and send a 199 response upstream for each such early dialog 
> satisfying the
>   following conditions:
>   -- the proxy does not intend to forward the final response 
> immediately
>      (in accordance with rules for a forking proxy);
>   -- the UAC has indicated support for the 199 response code;
>   -- the proxy has not already received and forwarded a 199 response 
> for
>      that early dialogue."
[JRE] Make it clear that all 3 conditions must be true, e.g., by saying
"satisfying all of the following conditions".

John

> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> [email protected] for questions on current sip Use 
> [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.