Re: draft-ietf-sip-199-06

"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF0B16806B@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
Hi, 

>>You can have network entities which act as "normal" UAS, which also 
>>want to send 199. They may e.g. have been configured to do so, since 
>>the forking proxy does not support 199. Etc.
>>And, the text already says that a UAS should not send a 199, unless it
has been configured to do so. But, I don't think 
>>we should forbid it from doing so.
>   
>
>No, but you need to motivate why they might do so. Explain that they're
sending it because they think there's an upstream 
>forking proxy that won't. Explain that they might be a B2BUA that has
created more than one early dialog with the caller, 
>and wants to clean some of them up. It makes little sense to say that
UAs can do this without some kind of explanation 
>about why they would do so.

The text does talk about the case when the UAS knows, based on
configuration, that the proxy does not support 199, but I agree that
some text about UAS/B2BUAs creating more than one dialog can be added.

Regards,

Christer
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.