Re: Comment on draft-roach-sipcore-rfc3265bis-00

Adam Roach <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <C5ED8944.9A31%[email protected]>


On 3/23/09 6:36 PM, "Dale Worley" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:32 -0700, Adam Roach wrote:
>> self-made GRUUs
> 
> What is a "self-made GRUU"?
 

See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-gruu-15#section-4.3

 
> At the least, I think that you *must* limit the ability to send 403 to
> devices that *are* using GRUUs as their contact.  I can *easily* see an
> implementor implementing the "403" part of -bis- and deciding to omit
> the "GRUU contact" part.

Sounds reasonable. Of course, you can send a 403 to any request at any time
according to local policy, but I see the potential need to warn people away
from sending it for this particular reason under these particular
circumstances.
 
>> The list you refer to is copied from various parts of the original text
>> (i.e., 3265). The intention is for this document to obsolete 3265, so
>> referring to 3265 for procedures would make no sense.
> 
> So you're saying that this list is *complete*?

What I'm claiming right now is that it is a complete list of every sentence
and clause in 3265 relating to the topic. A *complete* list would include
the stuff in 5057 -- but I'm hesitant to suck in 20+ pages of information
that is already specified elsewhere.

/a


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.