Re: Comment on draft-roach-sipcore-rfc3265bis-00

Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC314F97629F5@mail>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Roach [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 12:53 PM
> To: Hadriel Kaplan
>
> And, while I'm flattered that you think that the publication and/or the
> implementation of 3265bis will somehow outrun a document that's
> effectively at the finish line already, I think you are being somewhat
> over-optimistic in your evaluation. By the time 3265bis is an RFC,
> implementations will be further along.

My concern was more that it has nothing to do with implementations - it has to do with use.  I find many new drafts getting early implementation at Sipit's yet not finding them in actual use or even GA code.  Just because we publish an RFC does not mean a heck of a lot as to whether the market will use it.  :(

-hadriel
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.