Re: The problem with draft-kaplan-sip-secure-call-id-00
Victor Pascual Ávila <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Venkatesh <[email protected]> wrote: (snip) > If we are not planning on changing the BNF, I am wondering if this draft > should simply say that the string after the "@" sign MUST NOT include a > domain name, host address, MAC....? Or if this is ambiguous, simply say that > the UA MUST generate *another* cryptographic identifier to be placed after > the @ sign? This would be fair enough. -- Victor Pascual Ávila _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip