Re: New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep

yes

 

________________________________

	From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Mary Barnes
	Sent: 26 March 2009 23:17
	To: Christer Holmberg; [email protected]
	Subject: Re: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
	
	

	Hi folks,
	
	Christer has updated the document based on the action item from
Wednesday's SIP session (chaired by SIPPING chairs and modeled as the
proposed DISPATCH WG).  If folks could please review the document and
raise any concerns on the document now, that would be appreciated. We
ask specifically for an answer to the question:  Do you support the
document being adopted as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)?  A simple "yes"
is fine, however, if you don't think we should adopt this document,
could you please provide the reason.
	
	For your convenience, here's the link to the document:
	http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-keep-04.txt
	And, the diff:
	
http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmb
erg-sip-keep-03.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-sip-kee
p-04.txt
	tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/dfyvxz
	
	Regards,
	Mary
	SIPPING WG co-chair
	
	
	-----Original Message-----
	From: [email protected] on behalf of Christer Holmberg
	Sent: Thu 3/26/2009 12:41 PM
	To: [email protected]
	Subject: [Sip] New version of draft-holmberg-sip-keep
	
	
	Hi,
	
	I've submitted a new version (-04) of the keep draft.
	
	The requirement text is now alligned with the text shown on the
slides
	during the SFO SIP WG presentation.
	
	There are no other changes in the document from the previous
version.
	
	Regards,
	
	Christer

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip