Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
inline: Dean Willis wrote: > > On Mar 30, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Uzelac, Adam wrote: >> >> >> The need is IDENTITY first and foremost. > > Is that signaling identity, or media identity, or both? > > Is either useful alone? > > I'm thinking that a lot of people are demanding signaling identity > without media identity, and haven't really thought about the > consequences of that decision because they grew up with a telephone > system that essentially lacks the distinction. From an end user perspective, I would assert that the most important thing is probably the media. If the callerID says, "this is bob", what is important to the user, is that when I pick up the phone and start talking, it will be Bob who hears me, and Bob that I hear. Consider this litmus test: If the signaling actually came from Mary (perhaps as a third party), but the media goes/comes to/from Bob, who should appear on the caller ID? I say - Bob. -Jonathan R. -- Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 111 Wood Avenue South Cisco Fellow Iselin, NJ 08830 Cisco, Voice Technology Group [email protected] http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (408) 902-3084 http://www.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip