Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > inline: > > Dean Willis wrote: >> >> On Mar 30, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Uzelac, Adam wrote: >>> >>> >>> The need is IDENTITY first and foremost. >> >> Is that signaling identity, or media identity, or both? >> >> Is either useful alone? >> >> I'm thinking that a lot of people are demanding signaling identity >> without media identity, and haven't really thought about the >> consequences of that decision because they grew up with a telephone >> system that essentially lacks the distinction. > > From an end user perspective, I would assert that the most important > thing is probably the media. If the callerID says, "this is bob", what > is important to the user, is that when I pick up the phone and start > talking, it will be Bob who hears me, and Bob that I hear. > > Consider this litmus test: > > If the signaling actually came from Mary (perhaps as a third party), but > the media goes/comes to/from Bob, who should appear on the caller ID? I > say - Bob. There is a timing aspect in favor of placing identity in signaling -- I would like to know whose call is ringing before I answer (if I do). -jiri > > -Jonathan R. > > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip