Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC315032295C7@mail> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dean > Willis > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 12:08 AM > > So, we need identity in signaling, we need identity in media, and we > need the two identity expressions to match. > > That's what we get with RFC 4474 and DTLS/SRTP. > > Why were we trying to change it to protect something else? Well, for one, you can get identity in signaling and identity in media using DTLS/SRTP *without* using RFC-4474 as currently defined. We're trying to get it to NOT protect things that don't need to be protected for identity to be attained. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip