Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <28B7C3AA2A7ABA4A841F11217ABE78D6758061B5@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Cullen wrote:

> The thing I keep asking is can we make a list of reason why 
> SDP and headers get changes and in what scenarios they do 
> this. I think it will be hard to sort how to fix this without 
> being clear what needs to be fixed.
>  

Isn't that the function of the text that was placed in section 8 of

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-elwell-sip-e2e-identity-important-03

If it is not, then what do you think is missing.

regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 11:32 PM
> To: Jiri Kuthan
> Cc: [email protected]; Francois Audet
> Subject: Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not 
> used in the field
> 
> 
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
> 
> >
> > I'm worried this is only a wishful thinking. While 
> perfectly logical, 
> > still even in such constrained setups some bizzar ALGs do in my 
> > experience appear in the middle, change SDP and make thus 
> the identity 
> > worthless.
> 
> The thing I keep asking is can we make a list of reason why 
> SDP and headers get changes and in what scenarios they do 
> this. I think it will be hard to sort how to fix this without 
> being clear what needs to be fixed.
> 
> For example, one of the things we might want to say is 
> something like:  
> the Phone is behind a NAT and connects to it's proxy / 
> registrar for its' domain. That proxy/b2bua whatever mucks 
> with IP/ports in the SDP for NAT traversal. Then we could ask 
> if 4474 is broken in this case or not and what might be a 
> good way of solving the problem of having UAs behind NATs.
> 
> Cullen <in my individual contributor role>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> [email protected] for questions on current sip 
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.