Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dan Wing wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dean Willis [mailto:[email protected]] >> But the transit ISP should be routing the packets using their source >> and destination IP addresses, not mucking about in the application >> protocol. > > The transit SIP provider has every interest in hiding the IP addresses > of their own equipment and of the actual peers. Otherwise, the peers > may make their own business agreement and circumvent the 'service' > being provided by the transit SIP provider -- or so the argument > goes. If the peers can circumvent the SP and make their own business agreement, then perhaps the SP wasn't actually providing a service. Paul _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip