Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC315048C4ACA@mail> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dean Willis [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:48 AM > > Dude! This is the INTERNET engineering task force. You want private > circuit switched networks, see the ITU. That's odd, I could have sworn the IETF defined MPLS-TE, VPLS, PWE3, BGP/MPLS L3VPNs, tunnel-mode IPsec, SOCKS, and TURN. Has anyone notified the relevant WG's to notify them they don't belong in the IETF religious sect? -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip