Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
"Francois Audet" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1D3B4070@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> |
> Except we MUST have a problem, because several folks keep > saying we do. > > So Cullen et. al. have been pushing us to nail down exactly > what the problem is (and saying RFC 4474 is broken by SBCs is > not an answer; it is a symptom). > > So what seems to be the problem? The problem is that people seem to prefer changing the SDP than using TURN, because it is easier and more convenient. And what draft-wing-sip-identity-media does is show how and 4474-like mechanism that doesn't protect the IP address can be used in conjunction with DTLS-SRTP, to provide an adequate level of security. So, I'll repeat the question from a previous email: what's wrong with draft-wing-sip-identity-media??? _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip