Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field

On Apr 1, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Jiri Kuthan wrote:

> Dean Willis wrote:
>> On Mar 30, 2009, at 8:03 PM, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>>>
>>> There is a timing aspect in favor of placing identity in signaling  
>>> --
>>> I would like to know whose call is ringing before I answer (if I  
>>> do).
>> So, we need identity in signaling, we need identity in media, and  
>> we need the two identity expressions to match.
>
> I'm personally happy with having it only in signaling. Should there
> be some in media too, I would be in favor of keeping those two
> separate -- I'm not a particular fan of protocol dependencies.
> That's just not about aesthetic expression -- once a protocol
> begins to depend on other protocol, which one possibly does not
> need, the cost and adaptability decreases. Single-purpose
> things without dependencies have a much sounder chance of
> deployment.
>

So you're okay with knowing who dialed you, but not knowing who you  
are actually talking to?

Personally, I want something that at least correlates the signaling  
and media streams.

--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip