Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 2, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Francois Audet wrote: > >> Except we MUST have a problem, because several folks keep >> saying we do. >> >> So Cullen et. al. have been pushing us to nail down exactly >> what the problem is (and saying RFC 4474 is broken by SBCs is >> not an answer; it is a symptom). >> >> So what seems to be the problem? > > The problem is that people seem to prefer changing the SDP than > using TURN, because it is easier and more convenient. > > And what draft-wing-sip-identity-media does is show how and 4474-like > mechanism that doesn't protect the IP address can be used in > conjunction with DTLS-SRTP, to provide an adequate level of security. > > So, I'll repeat the question from a previous email: what's wrong with > draft-wing-sip-identity-media??? If I understand the argument, extending the d-w-s-i-m approach to non- DTLS media legitimizes the obfuscation of the one media identifier we do have -- the IP address. Some people seem to find this unacceptable. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip