Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Victor Pascual Ávila <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Dean Willis <[email protected]> wrote: > So are there any legitimate use cases for requiring that the protocol > supports MITM rewriting of SDP? Today, rewriting SDP bodies to convey QoS information to the terminals might be a valid use case (e.g. "group several flows into a single QoS reservation flow"). Anyway, one could expect that mechanisms like draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework will become adopted in a near future. -- Victor Pascual Ávila _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip