Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field

"Francois Audet" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1D450582@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
 
> But if some service provider in the middle needs to drop the 
> call to <some spiffy codec> which isn't supported by Alice's 
> SP nor by Bob's SP -- what would that service provider do?  
> Not deploy that spiffy new codec, even though it would save 
> them thousands of dollars a day in satellite bandwidth fees?

Well, no. You just can't do end-to-end media security in this
case.

I don't understdand at all the claim that if transcoding is 
allowed, there would be any point in doing media security, or
even Secure identity for that matter. I'm just saying if transcoding
or media mucking-around is allowed, then just stick with P-AI.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.