Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field

"Elwell, John" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D001C1EDDC@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net>
Technically you are correct, of course, but in many practical situations
the UAS implicitly knows the final target AoR based on the contact URI
received in the Request-URI. Also with the proposed change to
History-Info it would receive an explicit indication. I don't think this
impacts my argument.
 
John


________________________________

	From: Hans Erik van Elburg [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: 10 April 2009 09:36
	To: Elwell, John
	Cc: Francois Audet; Jon Peterson; Dean Willis; Cullen Jennings;
[email protected]; DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
	Subject: Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used
in the field
	
	
	But the UAS will mostly receive its own contact address in the
Request-URI, so there is not much to judge there. 
	
	/Hans Erik van Elburg
	
	
	
	On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Elwell, John
<[email protected]> wrote:
	

		So the verifier or UAS knows for sure where the request
was originally targeted and has to use its own judgement as to whether
the changed Request-URI is reasonable or not.

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.