Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
"Elwell, John" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D001C1EDDC@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net> |
Technically you are correct, of course, but in many practical situations the UAS implicitly knows the final target AoR based on the contact URI received in the Request-URI. Also with the proposed change to History-Info it would receive an explicit indication. I don't think this impacts my argument. John ________________________________ From: Hans Erik van Elburg [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 10 April 2009 09:36 To: Elwell, John Cc: Francois Audet; Jon Peterson; Dean Willis; Cullen Jennings; [email protected]; DRAGE, Keith (Keith) Subject: Re: [Sip] francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field But the UAS will mostly receive its own contact address in the Request-URI, so there is not much to judge there. /Hans Erik van Elburg On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Elwell, John <[email protected]> wrote: So the verifier or UAS knows for sure where the request was originally targeted and has to use its own judgement as to whether the changed Request-URI is reasonable or not. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip