Re: francois' comments and why RFC4474 not used in the field
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 14, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Dan Wing (dwing) wrote: > > On Apr 14, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Dan Wing wrote: > > > > > > > > Today we do not have intermediaries modifying MESSAGE content in > > > transit, do > > > we? > > > > Yep, systems used by financial traders often add a disclosure > > message > > to the IM as they leave the site (much like what is done for email). > > Systems that scan for malware in IM often replace > > "suspicious" content > > with something else. The leading IM compliance systems allow complex > > edits and replacements for compliance reasons. > > Those devices are operated by their employer's systems, though. I > was asking about *transit* providers. > > > Yah, I don't know if some the IM federation groups do that type of thing in the middle or if it is all done at the edge. > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip