Re: draft-ietf-sip-record-route-fix-08 Changes

"Elwell, John" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D002393EA0@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net>
Well, I know what this means, but will your average reader understand
it? I think we are trying to say something along the lines that if the
transport protocol changes you SHOULD use the double Record-Route
technique, where the differences in transport protocol are reflected in
different values of the transport parameter (udp/tcp/sctp) and/or
different values of the URI scheme (sip/sips). Correct?

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of BONNAERENS Ben
> Sent: 05 August 2009 15:23
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-record-route-fix-08 Changes
> 
> Hi,
> version -08 of record-route fix has just been submitted.
> 
> Change log:
> - Changed its status from BCP to PS,
> - Take into account IESG reviews and subsequent comments on 
> the mailing
> lists, 
> they were summarized in Robert Sparks's document (rrf.txt), 
> so it has been integrated in version -08 with minor 
> refactoring from the
> authors (me and Ben).
> 
> The thoughest part was related to the SIP/SIPS question 
> raised by Cullen
> (http://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-sip-record-r
> oute-fix/c
> omment/98624/),
> so here is the text that was added in version -08 to answer this
> question:
> "Thus, if the transport protocol changed between its
>    incoming and outgoing sides, the proxy SHOULD use the double
>    Record-Route technique and SHOULD add a transport parameter to each
>    of the Record-Route URIs it inserts. With the exception that if TLS
> is
>    used as the transport protocol on either side of the proxy, the URI
>    chosen to place in the Record-Route header field value 
> reflecting the
>    interface using TLS will need to leverage the [RFC3263] 
> mechanisms to
>    indicate that TLS must be used rather attempting to use the
> deprecated
>    "transport=tls" URI parameter. See [RFC3261] Section 26.2.2 and
>    [I-D.ietf-sip-sips] Section 3.1.4 for more discussion."
> 
> Brds,
> Thomas & Ben
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.