Re: [Sip] Question on draft-ietf-sip-outbound-20 draft: multipleflowcreation
Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip-implementors,gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2009/8/31 Francois Audet <[email protected]>: > I would tend to disagree that a policy of "Use UDP preferably > and switch to TCP if message is too big" is a good policy. Especially > considering that you'd have to keep the TCP connection alive anyways. > > I believe that always using the TCP connection in this case would > make more sense. I agree totally. If a client uses UDP then it uses UDP and the same for TCP, but don't mix please, as mixing both protocols in the same client is an exotic and idealistic concept just feasible in a "ideal" world (the world described in RFC 3261). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors