Re: draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix-04

Dale Worley wrote:
> I think one can safely argue that we've always intended for IPv4
> addresses to be decimal, but I don't think we've ever stated that, and
> the word "decimal" doesn't appear in this draft.

Dale: Are you suggesting that we mandate that all IPv4 addresses
written in dotted-decimal form be really decimal?  Or just that the
SIP addresses behave so?

I doubt we can do the former through sip-ipv6-abnf-fix; I suspect
we can do the latter if the WG (which one?  sipcore?) or sponsoring
AD agrees on it, although this particular draft is limited to
fixing the IPv6 ABNF.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip