Re: Reg. refresher param in 2xx response
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[email protected]> Wed, 19 May 2010 11:28:16 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Organization | Digium, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/18/2010 09:08 AM, Harbhanu wrote: > Precisely, IMO too RFC doesn’t specify UAC behavior for this situation. That is generally the case; RFCs can't possibly define how an implementation should behave when interacting with a non-conforming implementation, because there are an infinite number of ways to be non-conformant. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: [email protected] Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business. Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP implementation. Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip. Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP specifications.