Re: cnonce in RFC 3261
Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:06:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2010/6/3 Moloud Mousavi <[email protected]>: > Regarding your question, please read RFC 3261. nonce and cnonce must not be equal. Period. > By the way, as I understood, there is a moderator here. Probably he/she knows what should be forwarded or not. There is no moderator inspecting each mail before allowing it to be published or not. For questions/doubts related to SIP protocol the sip-implementors maillist is the appropriate place. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business. Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP implementation. Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip. Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP specifications.