Re: Possible bug in "Non-INVITE Client Transaction" - 17.1.2.2

2011/4/8 Dean Willis <[email protected]>:
> I think you're right that the spec is written incorrectly. I believe it should describe that the multiplier on T1 doubles with each reset. This is not clear in the existing text. So for example, if 8*T1 < T2, then the third reset is 8*T1, and if 16*T1 < T2, then the 4th reset is 16*T2
>
> Otherwise said, MIN(2^N*T1,T2) where N is the repetition iterator.

That would clarify it, right.


>> PS: Sorry for the cross-posting, I don't know which maillist is better
>> to report it.
>
> [email protected] would probably be the right place.

Finally I've reported an errata for RFC 3261 (hope it's also a good place):

  http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3261


Thanks a lot.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business.
Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP implementation.
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip.
Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP specifications.