Re: draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; transport=dccp ?

Given that as far as I can see, the last version of this document expired i=
n 2008, I think you must regard any contents as historical.

It was never picked up by the SIP WG.

Regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> I=F1aki Baz Castillo
> Sent: 08 July 2011 17:53
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip] draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ;
> transport=3Ddccp ?
> =

> Hi, draft-jennings-sip-dtls defines:
> =

> - SIP over DTLS over UDP   =3D> Via transport: "DTLS-UDP"
> - SIP over DTLS over DCCP =3D> Via transport: "DTLS-DCCP"
> - SIP over DCCP                 =3D> Via transport: "DCCP"
> =

> The draft just defines new BNF grammar for Via transport field, but
> says nothing about SIP URI ;transport param.
> IMHO the draft MUST define a new value "dccp" for ;transport param.
> =

> Regards,
> =

> =

> =

> --
> I=F1aki Baz Castillo
> <[email protected]>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business.
> Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP
> implementation.
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip.
> Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP
> specifications.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business.
Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP =
implementation.
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip.
Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP spec=
ifications.