Re: draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ; transport=dccp ?

The only SIP document was RFC 5763. That doesn't define it, and doesn't app=
arently need it.

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: I=F1aki Baz Castillo [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 08 July 2011 20:52
> To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-jennings-sip-dtls: shouldn't it define ;
> transport=3Ddccp ?
> =

> 2011/7/8 DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <[email protected]>:
> > Given that as far as I can see, the last version of this document
> expired in 2008, I think you must regard any contents as historical.
> >
> > It was never picked up by the SIP WG.
> =

> Good point, I didn't realize of that. So, is there a draft or RFC
> defining SIP over DTLS-UDP?
> =

> --
> I=F1aki Baz Castillo
> <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business.
Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP =
implementation.
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip.
Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP spec=
ifications.