Re: Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630

I would suggest moving the discussion to either SIPCORE or DISPATCH.

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: I=F1aki Baz Castillo [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 16 September 2011 15:22
> To: Gurbani, Vijay K (Vijay)
> Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Horvath, Ernst; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Using TLS in the first hop - Bug in RFC 5630
> =

> 2011/9/16 Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]>:
> > The draft Keith is referring to here, if you are interested, is:
> > "The SIPSEC Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)" [1].
> >
> > There was a follow-up paper [2] that used the idea in the sipsec URI
> > draft to benchmark TLS per-hop and TLS end-to-end, treating the
> > intermediary proxies as a blind byte forwarder. =A0If you are interested
> > in the paper, drop me a private message and I can send you the PDF.
> =

> Hi Vijay, the PDF is already accesible in the link below :)
> =

> > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gurbani-sip-sipsec-01
> =

> =

> I would like to comment about this draft, is it the appropriate maillist
> for it?
> =

> =

> --
> I=F1aki Baz Castillo
> <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is essentially closed and only used for finishing old business.
Use [email protected] for questions on how to develop a SIP =
implementation.
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip.
Use [email protected] for issues related to maintenance of the core SIP spec=
ifications.