Re: PRACK: Change MUST requirement to include SDP offer in first reliable provisional response

Hi,

We discussed that at one point.

However, I think that is more related to how-to-reject-an-offer-in-PRACK
thread. This is about whether the first reliable provisional response
must contain an SDP offer.

Regards,

Christer 


________________________________

	From: Rockson Li (zhengyli) [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: 6. huhtikuuta 2009 7:53
	To: Hadriel Kaplan; Christer Holmberg; [email protected]
	Subject: RE: [Sipping] PRACK: Change MUST requirement to include
SDP offer in first reliable provisional response
	
	
	I totally agree with Hadriel's insight here.

	It should have been avoided to put too many jobs into PRACK, 

	I miss KISS(Keep It Simple and Stupid) principle 

	 

	Regards,

	-Rockson

________________________________

	From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Hadriel Kaplan
	Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:50 PM
	To: Christer Holmberg; [email protected]
	Subject: Re: [Sipping] PRACK: Change MUST requirement to include
SDP offer in first reliable provisional response
	
	

	 

	 

	In hindsight I'm thinking we probably also shouldn't have made
the SDP answer (or another offer) required or even possible in the PRACK
either.  I think it should have been for one and only one purpose: to
acknowledge receipt of the provisional response.  

	 

	-hadriel

	 

	 

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP