(no subject)

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sipping
Message-ID <[email protected]>
ter Holmberg <[email protected]>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?5Zue5aSN77ya?= Re: [Sipping]
 PRACK: Does non-200 response cease re-transmission ofreliable 18x?
Date: Mon,  6 Apr 2009 15:27:42 +0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Mailer: EPOC Email Version 2.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: i-default
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

First, services can be supplied with fewer messages.It will lighten the =
servers. Then, you can recognize the session for tone easily. This is =
helpful
 for those services such as CF(call forward), in which case there may be =
several early diologs.
Regards,
  Eric

[email protected] wrote:

> Yes.
> Early-session has already been implemented in own system. And I think it =
do
> have some advantage, as both early-session and session can be carried by =

> a message,
> also,early-session solves media clip.
> (P-early-media with different TO-tag is another way.)

I guess I'll have to stop saying I don't expect to see early-session
implemented by anyone. :-)

Do you find some advantage to it over simply using early media with a
different to-tag?

	Thanks,
	Paul
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.