答复: Re: Question about Call Fo rwarding Busy(CFB)

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sipping
Message-ID <OFA1E6F0F3.63FA8338-ON48257594.00012046-48257594.000396AE@zte.com.cn>
Hi,

Thanks for your answer.

Using forking, Offer/Answer would be in two different dialogs. So, it has 
no such problem. But the TISPAN's standard using B2BUA mode for Call 
Forwarding.

As:

if A-C's negotiate still in the original dialog(having done A-B's 
negotiate), then it is B2BUA mode:

1. if the INVITE to C has Offer, there would be using C's Answer as Offer 
send to A, usually using UPDATE.


                 |---->Offer(1)
                 |<----Answer(2)
 Offer(3) <----|
Answer(4) ---->|

Then we would have to judge whether the Answer(4) should be intercept or 
transfer. If it should be transfered, then its the begin of next loop as 
the current one.

2. if the INVITE to C has no Offer, then C's Offer would has different 
stream as A's original desire. It is also a well known problem.


So. I want to know how you considering the problems. Thanks.

Gao





Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> 
2009-04-09 21:32

收件人
[email protected]
抄送
[email protected]
主题
Re: [Sipping] Question about Call Forwarding Busy(CFB)








[email protected] wrote:
> 
> Use case: A call B(Busy), AS forward the call to C.
> 
> By TISPAN standard(current 3GPP 24.404), AS would send INVITE to C. And 
> this INVITE contain A's initial Offer.
> 
> But if considering precondition, B would has Offer/Answer with A.
> Now, should the INVITE(by AS) contain A's initial Offer or not?  Or is 
> there standard define it?

Are you assuming that the AS is acting as a proxy? Or as a B2BUA?

Assuming its a proxy:

If B is busy, then I would expect that there was no answer from B. 
Rather just an immediate 486 response. This would never reach A and so 
there is no issue.

If for some reason B did send an answer in a provisional response before 
signaling busy, then that would establish an early dialog with to-tag B.
Then later there will be a 486 response, intercepted by the AS, and not 
forwarded to A.

And then a copy of the original INVITE will be sent by the AS to C. When 
C responds with an answer, it will be with to-tag C. Hence A will see 
this as a new early (or final) dialog.

A must negotiate the preconditions independently in the two dialogs.

                 Thanks,
                 Paul




--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.