Re: FYI: RADIUS & SIP

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sipping
Message-ID <40FB0FFB97588246A1BEFB05759DC8A003338053@S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de>
Jiri,

I don't understand what is the message of your e-mail. I wrote this
e-mail 2003. It's 6 years ago...

Laura




> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jiri Kuthan
> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 10:19 PM
> To: Liess, Laura
> Cc: Dumler, Alexander; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> Wolff, Christian
> Subject: Re: [Sipping] FYI: RADIUS & SIP
> 
> to my best knowledge, iptel.org SIP Express Router's radius 
> implementation
> is quite widely used. We don't trace the use though.
> 
> -jiri
> 
> Liess, Laura wrote:
> > I think most carriers currently use some kind of RADIUS 
> platform to do 
> > user authentication and they would like to reuse it in the 
> future to 
> > authenticate their SIP customers. My colleagues who are 
> responsible for 
> > the RADIUS Platform of the Deutsche Telekom (CC)are currently on 
> > vacation so I could not check with them now about how to 
> answer this 
> > mail, but we already talked about this issue a number of 
> times and my 
> > strong opinion is that "yes, Deutsche Telekom cares a lot 
> about SIP and 
> > RADIUS". Reusing the existing RADIUS platform for SIP 
> authentication is 
> > a strong requirement for the development of SIP services within the 
> > Deutsche Telekom. 
> > Laura (T-Systems/Deutsche Telekom Group) 
> > 
> >> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Henning Schulzrinne [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2003 09:45
> >> An: [email protected]
> >> Betreff: [Sipping] FYI: RADIUS & SIP
> >>
> >>
> >> Bernard Aboba <[email protected]> would like to know 
> about people 
> >> and companies that care about SIP and RADIUS (for authentication). 
> >> There is an attempt afoot to rationalize RADIUS-related 
> efforts within 
> >> the IETF, but there seems to be a lack of representation from SIP 
> >> folks, as per the note to the radius-authors mailing list:
> >>
> >> "I was not clear about the need for SIP/RADIUS work. 
> Apparently there is
> >> ongoing deployment of I-Ds (e.g. the Sterman draft on 
> RADIUS attributes
> >> for HTTP Digest Authentication), so perhaps 
> standardization would be
> >> valuable in documenting what is in use. On the other hand, I also 
> >> heard that "there
> >> isn't much commercial interest." Note sure what to make of 
> this, perhaps
> >> someone can clarify."
> >>
> >> Henning
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sipping mailing list  
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> >> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> >> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> >> Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP
> >>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> > This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> > Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> > Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP
> 
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.