Re: About offeranswer draft:

another correction :-(
(I'm having a bad day that way)

Paul Kyzivat wrote:
...
> I think you may be talking about cases where the call has been forked to 
> different destinations, and the distinct answers are coming from them. 
> Is that right?
> 
> Because in that case the responses should have different to-tags, thus 
> becoming distinct (early) dialogs. The discussion we are having is about 
> what happens in a *single* dialog. And in a single dialog the behavior 
> you describe is *wrong*.
> 
> When there are multiple early dialogs, it is indeed a challenge for the 
> UAC to figure out what to do. And one of the things it might choose is 
> to listen to one input stream and ignore the others. Unfortunately, 
> there is universal and certain way to associate the incoming media 

s/there is universal/there is *no* universal/

> streams you are receiving with the answers you have received in the 
> signaling. You can do so in certain cases that may apply to you, such as 
> when symmetric RTP is used (address/port of sender is same as 
> address/port that is listened on.)

	Sorry,
	Paul
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP