Re: Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???

> At this point, we are arguing about the *intent* of the text - it is
> clearly confusing to some people.
> 
> And AFAIK we (me, Gao, Shinji, and Christer) are all in agreement that
> the intent of the existing text is that:
> 
> - *if* the UAC receives SDP in an unreliable response before
>   receiving it in a reliable response, it MUST begin to use it
>   in the same way that it would use it if that SDP had been
>   received in a reliable response,
> 
> - but that it is not officially "the answer", and so it is not
>   yet permissible to initiate another o/a exchange until a reliable
>   response containing "the answer" is received.
> 
> - but when "the answer" is received, it MUST be ignored
>   (rather than "used") if an earlier SDP has already been
>   received and so "treated as the answer".
> 
> Are *we* all in agreement that this is the one and only *intended*
> meaning of the text?

Yes.

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP