Re: RFC 5876 on Updates to Asserted Identity
Volkan Hatem <[email protected]> Sat, 1 May 2010 15:09:32 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip-implementors,gmane.ietf.sipping |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Any opinions? On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Volkan Hatem <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Does RFC5876 describe an alternative method to RFC4916? > > Or, is it intended to complement RFC4916 in a trusted environment > where RFC4474 is not supported, implemented? > > The following paragraph is from section 3.2: > > In one example, an established call passes through a gateway to the > PSTN. The gateway becomes aware that the remote party in the PSTN > has changed, e.g., due to call transfer. By including the > P-Asserted-Identity header field in an UPDATE request, the gateway > can convey the identity of the new remote party to the peer SIP User > Agent (UA). >