Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios-13.txt
Frank Shearar <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:27:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sipping |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2010/06/14 21:01, Fabio Margarido wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 15:53, Frank Shearar > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Looking at my suggestion again, perhaps this is an improvement: >> >> The first is when SIP uses a reliable, connection orientated transport >> protocol such as TCP. In this case, SIP has an inherent mechanism ... >> >> and then start the last sentence of the paragraph like so: >> >> The second case is when SIP uses an unreliable transport protocol such as >> UDP, where ... > > Hi Frank. > I believe your suggestion is fine, I was just pointing that > 'orientated' should be changed to 'oriented'. Oh, right. I _think_ it's acceptable English to use either form. My own preference is for "oriented". This URL[1] says that "orientated" is the general British preference, while "oriented" is prevalent in technical use and in the US. frank [1]http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutgrammar/oriented _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP