Re: RFC 6157 actually updates RFC 3263 too - dual stack DNS lookups

On 2011/10/3 Olle E. Johansson<[email protected]> wrote:
> The clause about a dual-stack user agent clearly doesn't follow RFC
> 3263, since it implies "and" instead of "or". There's no MUST, SHOULD
> or MAY language applied here, so it seems like this is an oversight -
> not that RFC 6157 is wrong, but that there should have been a more
> clear update to RFC 3263.

Interesting reading of the tea leaves.

One thing you may want to do is to file an errata (see "How to Report
Errata" at http://www.rfc-editor.org/how_to_report.html).

Then, the authors and any verifying parties will deliberate on whether
or not this is indeed an errata.  This appears to work for errata in
text, but your claim is that rfc6157 should have updated rfc3263 as
well, so the change is in the masthead of rfc6157 and not in the text
itself.

I suspect that a decision will be made on what to do after an errata
is filed ...

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments of core SIP