RE: Certificate email addresses
"Blake Ramsdell" <[email protected]> Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:24:41 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime-examples |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAARMPfbnbp50SwK3EZjypY2MKAAAAQAAAAW1kPXpTuJEi1GQCizns8MAEAAAAA@brutesquadlabs.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Paul Hoffman / IMC > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 3:10 PM > To: Blake Ramsdell; 'ietf-smime-examples' > Subject: RE: Certificate email addresses > > At 3:01 PM -0800 4/2/03, Blake Ramsdell wrote: > >Then there's a lot more certificates that need to be regenerated ;) > >Like all of them. > > > >Blake > > Yaaarg, you're right. Never mind. > > In the future, we are supposed to use "example.com", as specified in > BCP 32. No big deal, though. OK, I'm going to do the following: 1. Regenerate the certificates I specified using "examples.com" for consistency's sake. 2. If 1 goes OK, I will regenerate all of them with "example.com". I don't have a Diffie-Hellman implementation, but that shouldn't be relevant -- the public key is opaque for the purpose of generating the certificate, so it is unlikely that I will mess it up. The only risk with 2 is that I break something in the re-encoding process (possible). Let me see how carefully I can tinker with their brains ;). Blake