RE: RC2ParameterVersion in example 6.3
"Blake Ramsdell" <[email protected]> Sat, 3 May 2003 13:57:31 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime-examples |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAARMPfbnbp50SwK3EZjypY2MKAAAAQAAAAaKO9sWR0HkmLDwpKQ3qwcQEAAAAA@brutesquadlabs.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Hoffman / IMC [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2003 9:59 AM > To: Blake Ramsdell; 'ietf-smime-examples' > Subject: Re: RC2ParameterVersion in example 6.3 > > Man, we went through this a zillion times when we writing S/MIME v2. > Could someone verify this for me? I'm happy changing the title of the > example, but don't want to fall into the same hole we have in the > past. I agree -- it would indeed be helpful if someone researched this independently. Last night while working with this example, it correctly decrypted using effective key bits of 128: SMIMECryptUtil - version is 58 SMIMECryptUtil - RC2 version 58 maps to effective key length 128 SMIMECryptUtil - iv SMIMECryptUtil - Cipher 1.2.840.113549.3.2 maps to encryption algorithm RC2/CBC/PKCS5Padding EnvelopedData - Back from handleEncryptedContentInfo, looks like everything decrypted EnvelopedData - Data was decrypted TestEnvelopedData - Content bytes: 0000 54 68 69 73 20 69 73 20 73 6F 6D 65 20 73 61 6D This is some sam 0010 70 6C 65 20 63 6F 6E 74 65 6E 74 2E ple content. Blake