Draft-11: More complete results
"Jim Schaad" <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Aug 2003 14:29:47 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime-examples,gmane.ietf.smime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
People, I now have only a couple of examples that I have not checked. There are a couple of failures in this set of messages from my perspective. jim 4.1 pass 4.2 pass 5.1 pass 5.2 pass 5.3 -- not checked --- 5.4 pass with comments 1. certificates are Alice DSS, Carl DSS (root), Alice RSA 5.5 pass 5.6 --- not checked -- - structurally fine -=20 - First Sig checks Diane signature unchecked 5.7 pass 5.8 -- not checked -- 1. I have an assumption that the wrong signature OID is used in the message.=20 5.9 FAILED=20 1. id-dsa is the signature algorithm not id-dsa-with-sha1 2. Commentary text states that the body part is the same as 5.1 - this is not correct as the signature values and exContent are different (content is actually "\0xd\0xaThis is some sample content."=20 5.10 pass with comments 1. List of attributes is 1. content type 2. message digest 3. 1.2.5555 (unknown) 4. content hint 5. smime capabilities 6. security label 7. content reference 8. encrypt key preference 9. ML expansion history 10. Equivalent label 5.11 pass with comments 1. Text should be Alice's and Carl's DSS certificates. 6.1 passed with comments 1. New commentary to add to replace that at the end of the message is appended to this message. 6.2 passed 6.3 passed with comments 1. RC2/128 for the content encryption algorithm. 6.4 passed 6.5 passed=20 6.6 -- not checked -- 6.7 passed 6.8 -- not checked -- 6.9 FAILED Recip #1 pass Recip #2 pass Recip #3 FAIL Content hints says the content is 1.2.6.5.4 not id-data 6.10 pass 6.11 FAILED test vectors are appended below on this message. I don't know where I am going wrong and this code worked in the past. 7.0 pass 8.1 passed 8.2 passed with comment Need to specify that this uses the same key value as does 8.1 9 -- checked-- 10.1 -- not checked -- 10.2 checked 11.1 FAILED 1. Text states signed with RSA, message signed with DSA 2. DSA signature OID incorrect 3. I retract the comments about the receipt request and AliceRSA. This is fine. The only odditity is the the receipt is going to a non-example address ([email protected]) 11.2 FAILED 1. I do not get the same value for the msgSigDigest attribute as this message has. I am investigating further. 11.3 passed 11.4 passed 11.5 -- not checked --=20 11.6 -- not checked -- ***************************** 6.1 intermediate data for document ********************** Z ae c3 35 7f 90 75 b5 e4 c5 f8 92 6b 9e c5 96 a3 24 52 9d 85 32 60 7b 8b bd c2 a7 39 63 e9 d6 93 ad d5 1f 56 8d 91 97 72 a9 c2 f4 83 27 fa 37 3d 13 12 f3 3b 5c 8d ec ce 6b 2d 4f f1 9b 4c 91 e4 6d c0 68 1a 2e e0 c4 07 46 c3 f2 90 f4 ae fe c8 d8 ef dc ca 84 d5 fd 3a 36 ee ba 67 16 18 7f a3 de f3 df 3b 66 e1 6a 0b 79 bb 6a 50 c2 63 9f 24 ed 9b 17 d8 c1 b4 4e 8a a1 6a 35 02 d0 81 9c a3 X9.42 Other Info encoding for first hash 30 61 30 13 06 0b 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 09 10 03=20 06 04 04 00 00 00 01 a0 42 04 40 a9 74 c4 e9 aa=20 79 d3 ce 5c 74 a4 ed a5 db 65 f5 c0 37 d6 81 f1=20 0a 93 5f 24 a1 db 97 96 ee 87 8b 79 db e9 07 11=20 23 ce 70 24 84 30 72 02 83 d5 7d 60 d3 d4 f6 a7=20 4d 4c c2 e0 89 fa cd 59 20 a2 93 a2 06 04 04 00=20 00 00 c0 =20 Hash Result #1 5d fa dc ad 89 87 33 7c ec cf af 8a fc e8 fd 56=20 38 d8 89 0c =20 Hash Result #2 74 f2 fb f8 2c d7 bd 7a 92 1b 3c 10 df 16 0b a9 64 08 f2 a5 =20 3DES Key Encryption Key 5d fb dc ad 89 86 32 7c ec ce ae 8a fd e9 fd 57 38 d9 89 0d 75 f2 fb f8 =20 3DES Content Encryption Key 92 40 51 b6 43 16 13 52 f7 ad 92 cb f2 57 3e 7f a8 ce 02 ba b6 2a cd c2 =20 ***************************** 6.11 intermediate data from my test **************** But it fails.... Wrapped key 0x0012F248 74 31 c0 45 51 4c 3c 2d 2e da 63 50 8b ae d4 ac t1=C0EQL<-.=DAcP.=AE=D4=AC 0x0012F258 64 cc 95 ae af cd 0f 8c b6 48 1f 0= b 45 12 4d fb d=CC.=AE=AF=CD..=B6H..E.M. 0x0012F268 a4 ab c7 83 30 4b 69 ad =A4=AB=C7.0Ki= =AD Mail list key 0x00324354 25 5e 0d 1c 07 b6 46 df b3 13 4c c8 43 ba 8a a7 %^...=B6F=DF=B3.L=C8C=BA.=A7 0x00324364 1f 02 5b 7c 08 38 25 1f After decrypt #1 0x00324630 d7 10 66 ee 9a 42 e0 80 62 a3 e5 de b5 ef 4e 7e =D7.f..B..b=A3.=DE=B5.N~ 0x00324640 5f 13 30 b5 13 d3 a8 4f be dc 02 d4 = 81 27 db 50 _.0=B5.=D3=A8O=BE=DC.=D4.'=DBP 0x00324650 e5 d8 0f e9 25 38 f1 7b .=D8..%8.{ IV 0x00324630 7b f1 38 25 e9 0f d8 e5 {.8%..=D8. Post Decrypt #2 0x00324630 50 db 27 81 d4 02 dc be 4f a8 d3 13 b5 30 13 5f P=DB'.=D4.=DC=BEO=A8=D3.=B50._ 0x00324640 7e 4e ef b5 de e5 a3 62 80 e0 = 42 9a ee 66 10 d7 ~N.=B5=DE.=A3b..B..f.=D7 Computed check sum 0x0012EFD8 53 fb 3e cc 8a 06 cc af S.>=CC..=CC=AF Actual Check sum 80 e0 42 9a ee 66 10 d7 --- they don't match!!!!!