RE: RC2 inconsistency
"Blake Ramsdell" <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:37:17 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime-examples |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAARMPfbnbp50SwK3EZjypY2MKAAAAQAAAAlyNQt/[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Schaad [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 12:17 AM > To: 'Blake Ramsdell'; [email protected]; 'Paul > Hoffman / IMC' > Subject: RE: RC2 inconsistency > > I concur that this is what happens. > > I had just transcribed the key from the examples draft and there had > previously posted that I could decrypt 6.7 but not 6.9. If I use the > key with the CRLF included in the middle of things then I can decrypt > example 6.9. In my case, by some miracle, I read the key in from the disk file for 6.9, and used the transcribed key for 6.7. When I was buttoning this all up to call it a night, I noticed the inconsistency and when I switched my 6.7 test to use the disk file, it broke. I should be able to graft in a new KEKRI without disturbing the rest of the example. Is there consensus about your comment that "Content hints says the content is 1.2.6.5.4 not id-data"? I believe that this comment is correct, and the ContentType in the example should be id-data. Blake