Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-freeman-message-access-control-req-00.txt

"Jim Schaad" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.smime
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I have additionally released two documents which provide a potential method
of implementing the requirements

These are:
      http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schaad-eps-smime-00.txt  which describes
the additions to the CMS and S/MIME formats to support the concept and
     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schaad-eps-trust-00.txt which gives a
possible description of how to communicate between the mail client and the
enforcement server.

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Trevor Freeman
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 9:28 AM
> To: Smime ([email protected])
> Subject: [smime] FW: I-D Action:draft-freeman-message-access-control-req-
> 00.txt
> 
> This should be of interest to members of the members of the list.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:i-d-announce-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 3:15 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: I-D Action:draft-freeman-message-access-control-req-00.txt
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
> 
> 	Title           : Requirements for Message Access Control
> 	Author(s)       : T. Freeman, et al.
> 	Filename        : draft-freeman-message-access-control-req-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 17
> 	Date            : 2011-01-20
> 
> There are many situations where organizations want to include
>   information which is subject to regulatory or other complex access
>   control policy in email. Regulated information requires some form of
>   robust access control to protect the confidentiality of the
>   information. The Enhanced Security Services for S/MIME [rfc2634]
>   defines an access control mechanism for S/MIME (eSSSecurityLabel).
>   This is a signed attribute of a SignedData object which indicates the
>   access control policy for the message. The fact that this is a signed
>   attribute protects the integrity of the data and the binding of the
>   label to the message but does not protect the confidentiality of the
>   information i.e. at the point where you lean the access control policy
>   to the data you also have access to the data. While the signature
>   provides integrity for the label over the clear text, it is
>   susceptible to unauthorized removal i.e. if you only have SignedData
>   message, any MTA in the mail path can remove a signature layer and
>   therefore remove the access control data.  Encrypting the signed
>   message protects the confidentiality of the data and protects the
>   SignedData from unauthorized removal but this hides the ESS security
>   label.
> 
>   From a regulatory enforcement perspective this is an extremely weak
>   form of access control because cryptographic access to the data is
>   given before the access check. The correct enforcement of the access
>   check totally depends on the configuration of the recipients email
>   client. Since the cryptographic access is granted before the access
>   checks, there is no significant impediment for a recipient who is
>   unauthorized under the policy to access the data. A stronger
>   enforcement model is needed for regulatory control for email where
>   cryptographic access is only granted after the access check.
> 
>   There are also many users on the Internet today who have some form of
>   authentication credential but they are not X.509 certificates and who
>   therefore cannot use S/MIME. There are now available, standard based
>   services (e.g. [SAML-overview]) which abstract the specifics of a
>   technology used to authenticate uses from the application itself (S/MIME
in
> this case). Adoption of this abstraction model would enable
>   a broader set of users who have other types to authentication
>   credentials to be able to use S/MIME to secure email. It also allows
>   for new authentication technology to be deployed without impacting the
>   core S/MIME protocol.
> 
>   This document specifies the requirements for:-
> 
> 
> Providing robust access control for S/MIME
> 
> 
> An abstraction layer for supporting other types of credentials for
> 
> using S/MIME.
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-freeman-message-access-
> control-req-00.txt
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-
> Draft.

_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.