Re: Secure e-Mail NG?

Francesco Gennai <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.smime
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Anders,

also if it doesn't represent an answer to your points of interest it could
be interesting to have a look at the following draft:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec/

that describes a system currently used in Italy.

It is more oriented to "certified email" than "secured email".

Francesco 
 
> As an active e-mail user I have always found email indispensable.
> That e-mail also is the least secure messaging system there is of course 
> a nuisance.

> Although e-mail hast lost some of its importance to other communication 
> systems, I still think it is worth an upgrade.

> STARTTLS is nice but its key handling and integration in e-mail clients is 
> not particularly useful.  Sending non-encrypted messages should be an 
> exception.

> IMHO, STARTTLS, DOMKEY and email clients could be combined so that we
> get domain-secured e-mail as default.

> Or is it better to create an entirely new messaging system to get rid of 
> the legacy?

> I believe the update frequency of today makes client upgrades a no-issue.

> Anders
> _______________________________________________
> smime mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime

_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.