Re: Secure e-Mail NG?
Francesco Gennai <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Anders, also if it doesn't represent an answer to your points of interest it could be interesting to have a look at the following draft: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec/ that describes a system currently used in Italy. It is more oriented to "certified email" than "secured email". Francesco > As an active e-mail user I have always found email indispensable. > That e-mail also is the least secure messaging system there is of course > a nuisance. > Although e-mail hast lost some of its importance to other communication > systems, I still think it is worth an upgrade. > STARTTLS is nice but its key handling and integration in e-mail clients is > not particularly useful. Sending non-encrypted messages should be an > exception. > IMHO, STARTTLS, DOMKEY and email clients could be combined so that we > get domain-secured e-mail as default. > Or is it better to create an entirely new messaging system to get rid of > the legacy? > I believe the update frequency of today makes client upgrades a no-issue. > Anders > _______________________________________________ > smime mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime