Re: A bit better operational practice?
Kohei Kasamatsu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Miller, Thank you for your email. I plan to propose a BCP or an informational RFC. (If possible, proposing a BCP is best as me.) Best regards, Kohei (2013/07/30 21:31), Miller, Timothy J. wrote: > Are you proposing a BCP or a new RFC or bis? Your list it sounds like a BCP to me. > > > > -- T > > > > ________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Kohei Kasamatsu [[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 01:10 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [smime] A bit better operational practice? > > Hi, SMIME list > > > There are many of MUA implementations for S/MIME and some banks or > corporations are using digital signature for their messages. > But in such cases, there are several points would hopefully be care in > technical aspects of S/MIME. > > Displaying assurance of organization of signer, keys and certificates > management criteria in MUA and CRL delivery into MUA are crucial > issues to enhace usage or deployment of acutual use of S/MIME. > > I would think about drafting a document as follows: > ----- > MUA and for qualified signatures: > - certificate selection in MUA > - for unified display (like green bar in browser) of showing > messages in MUA with valid/non-valid signatures > - operational pracice for digital signatures > (e.g. key length, validity, key store) > > Certificates for S/MIME: > - operational pracice for digital signatures > (e.g. key length, validity, key store, revocation control) > - certificate policy or singing policy for signer(S/MIME) > e.g.) Bank, corporation, goverment and/or for qualified signature > > etc.(other items in my mind) > ----- > > Are they impossible to be toss as a draft? > > If you have had considered such point of operational issues, > I would hope to share and get your reply. > (or talk to me either, in Berlin) > -- > Kohei Kasamatsu > > NTT Software Corporation > TEL: +81 45 212 7908 FAX: +81 45 212 9800 > E-mail: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > smime mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime > _______________________________________________ smime mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime